|
RECITAL
October 9, 2003
|
By Mack McCray
As I walked up Van Ness Avenue Thursday evening, I saw the floodlights arcing and circling in the black night sky. Davies Hall and the Opera House were dark, and the truck with the lights seemed to be parked in front of Herbst Theater, so the occasion must be either the Leif Ove Andsnes piano recital or the debut of a new greaseburger at the ubiquitous chain across the street.
I knew the glamour days of Rachmaninoff, de Pachman and Jose Iturbi were long gone, but hoping against hope I asked the bored truck driver what his lights were celebrating. He growled, "Beats the hell out of me!" The guard at the door was more helpful, assuring me that they were indeed "for some PEEanist." My pianist's heart proudly skipped a beat and I whispered "Oh frabjous day!"
To be utterly truthful, the lights turned out to be celebrating the gala opening of San Francisco Performances' 24th season, which happened to feature a pianist, but I choose to enjoy the narrower view. The recital began well past the 8:30 mark to accommodate the black-tie gala dinner guests, but it transpired that the wait was well worth it. We heard piano playing that will be very difficult to top as this season moves forward.
The program was anchored at each end by a large block of B-flat Major: Schumann's Faschingsschwank aus Wien (Vienna Carnival Jest), Opus 26, to begin, and Schubert's final Sonata, D. 960, to end. In between there was a bit of harmonic free-for-all in the form of two etudes and L'Isle joyeuse by Debussy.
Leif Ove Andsnes is, almost to a fault, a straightforward, honest and thoughtful player. Some pianists seem to generate each rhythmic pulse, and the music lives harrowingly and excitingly on the edge of these moment-by-moment choices. Of this type of artist the names of Cortot, Schnabel and Horowitz, and more recently Argerich and Uchida, come to mind. Andsnes seems to have his feet planted firmly in the other pianistic camp, inhabited by such honorable names as Rubinstein, Solomon and Lipatti and, again more recently, Ax and Ohlsson, in which the rhythmic field is taken as a given, and the music-making and poetry occur richly and perhaps more serenely within this frame. In other words, the grazing takes place in the pasture, not outside the fence. Of course this is a writer's generalization, and Andsnes is as capable of a heart-breaking rubato as Horowitz was of playing in time. But it is a generalization which helps pinpoint Andsnes' strengths and very rare weaknesses. At the beginning of the Schumann the playing, which was always clear and musical, seemed a bit heavy rhythmically, and while not overpedalled at least thickly pedalled. (I have always believed that the theme's opening chord should be followed by four unpedalled fast notes tum ta ta ta ta tum but I have yet to hear a pianist play it this way.) This may be the fault of the piece, which is somewhat problematic, but the feeling of a slight thickness persisted through the Romance, which ought to be almost neurotic in its plaintive, poignant repetitiveness, and the Scherzino, which could have been just a bit sillier. But then Andsnes caught fire and the recital, which was good to begin with, just kept getting better and better. What might have felt plain and heavy in the opening movement was gloriously alive and sparkling by the last movement. Very clearly, Andsnes is an artist of great control and taste: during this long program he let out the full stops of the piano only three times: at the conclusion of the last two Schumann movements and in L'Isle joyeuse. Even the final presto of the Schubert was only as fast and loud as it should have been in that context, though there are few pianists who have the self-control not to go for broke at the end of such a huge work.
The Debussy etudes, “Pour les sonorités opposées” and “Pour les arpèges composées,” were beautiful, full of color but never precious. L'Isle joyeuse was stunningly played. Perhaps the central "undulating" section could be accused of lacking the last degree of sensuousness, but the perfection and sheer good taste of the pianism surely warmed the heart of every pianist who was present. The Schubert was, bluntly put, a great performance, serious and very simply played. The artistry was always transparent so that I sometimes felt as if I were reading the score rather than hearing an "interpretation". Two days after the recital I am still savoring musical memories, and they are indeed musical and not about the feelings or "chops" of Leif Ove Andsnes, which is a high compliment. Perhaps the most deeply moving moments of the evening were in the Andante Sostenuto, where twice the music sinks into B-flat Major, and Andsnes let those haunting ghosts flicker across Herbst Theater with utter grace and sadness. While we love every type of artist (who wouldn't want to hear what Cortot or Argerich would do with the Schubert B-flat Major Sonata?), and we celebrate the diversity of this wide musical world, including the antics of Lang Lang and Kissin, there is a particularly refreshing feeling that Andsnes' kind of playing arouses in us a calm clear joy that springs from a deep and contemplative place. The two beautifully-played encores were the first Impromptu of Chopin and Walter Gieseking's delightful transcription of Richard Strauss' song, "Ständchen." So with relief I say, "Piano playing is alive and well", and I say "Happy Anniversary, Ruth Felt and San Francisco Performances (Many happy returns as long as they are on this level of artistry)," and I say "Keep that truck with the lights parked out in front of Herbst Theater we're not done celebrating!"
(Mack McCray is a concert pianist and a member of the faculty of the San Francisco Conservatory of Music.)
|
Leif Ove Andsnes