|
CHAMBER MUSIC REVIEW
March 5, 2006
|
By Michelle Dulak Thomson
It's only three months into the latest designated Mozart Year, and I suppose there are nine more months in which the concept could
pall, but for the moment I approve. At least, if programming and performances continue like this. Philharmonia Baroque just spent
the weekend highlighting some of the lesser-known (because almost-impossible) Mozart concert arias, and the same weekend saw the
Belcea Quartet (under the auspices of San Francisco Performances) opening a concert with Mozart's least-played great quartet, K.
499.
It's called the "Hoffmeister," after its publisher, because it wasn't dedicated to anyone in particular (the other nine "late"
quartets divide their dedications between Haydn and the King of Prussia). It's one of those pieces cursed by not being in the right
set, or having a moniker to which you can attach a tale. It's just a great piece, which when you're choosing between "great pieces
with great stories attached" and "great pieces, no stories attached," generally means obscurity. Not this year.
As Mozart goes, this is an insider's piece, full of things that you can only marvel properly at from within. The first movement's
development section, for example there's nothing quite like that in Mozart. (Haydn, yes.) One motif runs the whole thing,
always played by two people, but moving from duo to duo; and meanwhile the other motif, the opening one, is brewing in the
background, so that when it rises up and sinks down again into the recapitulation, it's the most natural thing in the world. The
rest of the piece is just as fine. The Minuet has one of quartetdom's great viola parts. The slow movement is another viola
paradise, I think the richest of all slow movements among the quartets, while the finale is solely and simply a blast.
It would be difficult to improve on the Belceas' "Hoffmeister." They are not an ordinary competition-circuit quartet. For one thing, they put much more thought and effort into articulation than they do into pouring out sound. It wouldn't be quite fair to say that leader Corina Belcea sets the tone; it's truer to say that she embodies it. Her alert, zesty, occasionally impetuous style is the style of her three comrades-in-arms. And everything they do, they seem to do with one mind, not in the Borg-Collective sense of some of the more obsessively rehearsed quartets, but just because they all want the same thing. In the "Hoffmeister," that meant richness tempered with spirited articulation. I don't think I've ever seen that viola part handled as well as Belcea violist Kryzstof Chorzelski did. It was all so deft that it was almost self-effacing, and yet it was marvelous playing. There's a place early in the "Hoffmeister"'s slow movement where the viola alone sustains through a rest. Just a held note, but in this case a held note to bring tears to the eyes. It was the same in the more familiar Mozart quartet ending the program, the "Dissonant" (K. 465). This group has the exceedingly rare knack of doing things in consort without seeming to choreograph them. There were dynamic effects in the "Dissonant" that in other hands would've sounded contrived or precious. They didn't Sunday. As for Britten's Third Quartet, which came in between there have been many local performances by visiting quartets, this being the perfect piece for any quartet wanting to show its dedication to contemporary music (quasi-contemporary, anyway the piece is into its fourth decade) without actually alienating anyone. None matched this, always alert, always full of life and attentive to color. Cellist Antoine Lederlin (with the Belcea only four months, though you'd never guess it) played the final Passacaglia with a mixture of wit and soul hard to describe. And second violinist Laura Samuel almost literally let all hell loose in the second-movement Scherzo, which begins as mayhem, gets all mellow for a spell, then goes nuts again. And Belcea's own performance of the central "Solo" was exquisite, gently and persuasively backed by her vibrato-free colleagues.
(Michelle Dulak Thomson is a violinist and violist who has written about music for Strings, Stagebill, Early Music America,
and The New York Times.)
|