|
BERKELEY FESTIVAL REVIEW
Faculty, Students, and Pro's
June 4, 2000
|
By Michelle Dulak
Much of the impetus for the establishment of the Berkeley Festival
came from UC/Berkeley's Department of Music. It was entirely
appropriate, therefore, that this year's week-long festival began on
Sunday with a grand collaboration between the department and the
festival's guests in the department's own Hertz Hall on the UC campus.
On the departmental side were four current faculty -- Marika Kuzma,
Kate Van Orden, Christy Dana, and Anthony Martin -- as well as the
organist and musicologist John Butt, on the faculty until a few years
ago. They came together with two department-sponsored student
ensembles (the Collegium Musicum and the Chamber Chorus), a number of
friends from the Bay Area's vibrant early-music scene, and the members
of The King's Noyse (the crack Renaissance instrumental band, in town
for the festival) to present a grand program, titled "Venice 1600,"
meant to recreate a festal Mass at the Basilica of San Marco in
Venice.
Given that this was the opening concert of a major international
festival, it was a little surprising to see the scholarly end of
things treated so casually. "Venice 1600" is an odd title for a
program much of whose music not only was written decades later, but
sounds it (rather as though a program centered on one of Bach's
chorale cantatas were titled "Leipzig 1700"!). And some of the pieces
chosen look awfully odd in the context of an early 17th century
Catholic Mass.
Venetian musicians were renowned, not to say notorious, for
embellishing their liturgy with music of a distinctly secular cast.
But I wonder whether even they would have gone so far as to use a
famous madrigal (Rore's "Ancor che col partire" -- played on
instruments, but still) as the processional introducing a high Mass.
And a vernacular devotional piece like Frescobaldi's "Maddalena alla
croce" would have had no place in a Latin liturgy, either, for this
was music meant for more private use.
But heck, why quibble, especially when the pieces that didn't really
"belong" on the program were among its highlights? The Rore was there,
presumably, to show off King's Noyse leader David Douglass' unearthly
facility in division-playing (that is, improvising around a melodic
line or over a given bass line) He obliged with a torrent of invention
(and of notes) such as to leave us breathless. Ellen Hargis' singing
of the Frescobaldi was breathtaking in a different sense -- still and
contained but suggesting somehow a composure attained painfully
through grief. Knowing Hargis only through her recordings, I had
thought of her as a fine "light" early-music singer, with a clear and
flexible voice and a charming way of inflecting lighter music. I had
not heard her dig so deeply into anything before. The surprise was
part of the delight.
The meat of the program, the five standard texts of the Mass, was
mostly Monteverdi. Monteverdi's Mass music is pretty sparse. From his
years in Venice there's a splendid, festive Gloria, a few bits of the
Credo text, and two complete mass settings -- but in the austere,
evenly flowing contrapuntal style that came to be called stile
antico ("old style"), rather than the "new" style he used for most
of his other music. Marika Kuzma and her choir went for the big
Gloria, taking the rest of the Mass from one or the other of the two
stile antico settings (except for the Sanctus, a radiant piece
in 12 parts by Giovanni Gabrieli).
The result was the kind of stylistic hodgepodge that must have been
commonplace in the early 17th century -- placidly contrapuntal one
moment, virtuosic and theatrical the next. In one place, indeed, the
disjunctions were a little too much for me. The Credo tidbits I
mentioned earlier were published in a huge Monteverdi print
containing, among other things, one of the two stile antico
Masses. Kuzma plugged them into the Credo she took from this Mass.
The Credo began, then, in "old-style" a cappella counterpoint,
suddenly changed in style (and acquired instrumental accompaniment) at
the "Crucifixus," and then went right back to the austere counterpoint
at "Et in Spiritum Sanctum." The print does explicitly suggest doing
this, true, but it doesn't really work. And it didn't help that the
little Credo movements, pretty obviously meant for solo voices, were
sung by the whole choir.
Elsewhere, though, the choir was a marvel -- sonorous, well balanced,
disciplined, attentive to words and to phrasing, and well blended even
when they had to split into what must have been uncomfortably small
groups, as in that 12-part Gabrieli Sanctus. Kuzma conducted them,
except in the Gloria, where she was replaced by John Butt (himself a
former conductor of the UCB Chamber Chorus). I could not see the
female solo singers from where I was sitting, and so it was only
afterward that I discovered that Kuzma was not conducting because she
was singing the second soprano solo -- very ably, I might add,
tracking Hargis nimbly in their many passages together in thirds. The
male soloists, drawn from the choir, were nearly a match for the
women, which is saying something. I would like very much to identify
them, but they were, incredibly, not identified in the program.
As for the instrumental music that surrounded and set off the Mass
movements, this was a collaborative effort, some pieces taken by
students in the UCB Collegium Musicum, some by local professional
players, some by the members of The King's Noyse, and a gratifying
number by all three.
The professional playing was often magnificent. I'm thinking
especially of the Castello sonata played by four King's Noyse strings,
with John Butt at the harpsichord. But more marvelous, to my mind, was
what Anthony Martin has done with the players of the Collegium, who
are now a pretty impressive Renaissance fiddle band, sporting the
appropriate bows, holding their instruments (in the approved manner)
halfway down their chests, and playing with energy, spirit, and
commendable accuracy. Students and professional musicians are often
thrown together in "collaborations" that are little more than
publicity stunts. Here, however, there seemed to be no condescension
and (more importantly) no reason for any.
(Michelle Dulak is a violinist and violist who has written about music
for Strings, Stagebill, Early Music America, and the New York Times.)
©2000 Michelle Dulak, all rights reserved |