sfcv logo

LISTENER'S BOX

Responses to "Handel in a Little Black Dress"

December 3, 2002



(Editor's Note: You can reach George Thomson's review of Alcina from last week's issue — click on "Last Week" at the bottom of the current Main Page — or by clicking here.)

While I totally agree with the criticism of the staging and at times absurd direction at SFO's Alcina, one could have more easily closed ones eyes if Handel's music was made more interesting by the singers' embellishments, totally expected in his day.

During that time of idolized castratti and great prime donne, the da capo arias were ideal settings, indeed purposefully so, for best displaying great voices. No great singer of the day would ever sing the music as bare bones as it was sung in SFO's Alcina. Handel didn't intend it to be sung that way!

After all these exalted performers were all as famous as, if not more famous than, the composer, and certainly vastly higher paid. So they would gladly boost their reputations and income with pyrotechnics, which captivated the audiences. It also made the da capo repeats eagerly anticipated and not something to make you look at your watch! Yet I do not recall anyone bringing up this enormous shortcoming.

Secondly, to me, there was no great "feeling" emanating from the orchestra pit. It was all very (too) correct and metronomic. With conducing like this, the ominous prediction in an Opera News editoral a while back — that in the near future most opera companies will have computer generated-orchestras — will come true sooner and without notice.

When I studied piano under a teacher who had studied with San Francisco's superb but unrecognized Lev Shor, she would always draw little squiggles between notes in Mozart sonatas, where I had to "breathe." Glenn Gould showed how this musical "breathing" could make Bach sound like singing and not simply dry aural architecture. There was none of it in Alcina. Little wonder that so many of the audience on the night of the premiere fled that austere, colorless rendering of Handel, set before a totally anti-Handelian production.

— Jack R. Juhasz

***

George Thomson's review of the imported Stuttgart production was the only one that I've read (formal review in publications or informal reviews on Internet groups by opera-goers) that even mentions the most offensive piece of stage business: the rape of Alcina. Only his term "assault" is too mild.

I cannot fathom why all the other reviewers chose to completely ignore the loathsomeness of this scene. The directors obviously thought up this completely gratuitous business with the intent to offend their audiences. And what did they (the directors) think of imposing this onto the singers who had to perform this act live, in front of 3000 people, while singing? In the other reviews, I had read about all puerile, silly stage actions and contortions to which the singers were subjected. Against my better judgment, I went to the show anyway. Had I known the directors had invented a rape scene, I certainly would have thrown away my ticket.

Having seen it, the horror of that scene has stuck. I can't bear to play music from Alcina now. Handel's music has nothing to do with the directors' sordid imagination, but their image remains. Thank you to Pamela Rosenberg for bringing Handel's wonderful music to new audiences.

She should hope that her audience has great endurance for ludricrous stagings and large stomachs for gratuitous brutality, if she wishes them to return next season.

— D. Nguyen

(SFCV welcomes reader commentary. Please send comments to editor@sfcv.org.)