October 15, 2011
Mariinsky: You Really Had to Be There
There was only one thing to regret about the Mariinsky Orchestra’s spectacular
performance of Tchaikovsky’s Symphony No. 5 in Berkeley on Saturday night — the empty seats in Zellerbach Hall. This was SRO, you-had-to-be-there stuff, Bay Area music lovers. Where were the rest of you?
Perhaps three Tchaikovsky symphony programs in one weekend seemed too much of a composer whom many concertgoers have filed away as a known quantity. But those present knew differently, or else discovered something new and unexpected, registering their response with a noisy, clamorous ovation. Music Director Valery Gergiev and his forces deserved every bit of it for their fully committed, deeply felt account of this repertory staple.
As they did with the Symphony No. 6, the Pathétique, on Friday, the Russian visitors filled a very familiar work with a propulsive sense of urgency and expansiveness. From the ardent opening of the first movement to a thunderous, terrifying climax of the fourth, the E-Minor Fifth held the listeners in its grip.
Tchaikovsky’s “Fate” motif was serious business right from the beginning, when it arose fully formed and replete with distinctive character in the clarinets. But Gergiev didn’t exploit the figure for its ominous immediate effect. He made it part of a drama that unfolded throughout. The first movement was a struggle of opposing forces, Beethoven-like, with the deep, rich, string phrases striving to soothe the tempests that kept breaking forth. Gergiev, at several points, slowed the tempo to near stasis, as if to interpose a necessary calm before the next outburst.
From the ardent opening of the first movement to a thunderous, terrifying climax of the fourth, the E-Minor Fifth held the listeners in its grip.
It might be tempting, after all that, to send the second movement aloft on its lyrical wings. While the Mariinsky artists can certainly spin out a phrase to ravishing effect, they are always reaching farther and deeper into the music. The opening passage of the Andante cantabile rose up like a dark wave, from basses to cellos to violas. When the great horn solo arrived, it came as a muted, fragile voice longing to connect somehow. The cellos sang back with gorgeous, wrenching sighs. The pizzicatos landed as emphatic winces. Mystery and consolation took their turns. If the first movement summoned Beethoven to mind, the second had the scope and inner turmoil of Mahler.
The Allegro skittered by, airborne and softly voluptuous. As the Fate motif arrived once again, near the end, Gergiev drove straight on to the Finale. The movement seemed like a prolonged spasm, as much for the careering strings as for the deep-throated, full-alarm trombones. The sound was mighty yet transparent, ferocious yet poised. Gergiev’s somber, almost terse way of taking his bows seemed altogether fitting. It affirmed that the Mariinsky musicians had shone their penetrating and revealing light where it belonged, not on themselves but rather on Tchaikovsky.
Busywork, but With Flourishes
The evening opened with the composer’s Symphony No. 2 in C Minor, the “Little Russian.” “Little,” to my ears, is the operative word. Spilling over with Russian folk tunes, the piece came off as pretty thin and sudsy. Some pleasing passages occur along the way — a deft interleaving of themes in the second movement, the engagingly sprung rhythms of the third. But much of the thematic development seems like busywork, covered up by occasional flourishes.
Gergiev let his troops loose for a fleet, bright-hued account of the work. The strings played with a glassy shining tone. The timpani and woodwinds got into a playful little skirmish in the second movement. No attempt was made to disguise the histrionics and pomposity of the Finale, with all its false finishes and a gong thrown in for good measure near the end. Some of it was fun. Almost all of it was forgettable.
The Mariinsky reserved one last packet of fireworks for an encore, the jauntily driving Polonaise from Tchaikovsky’s opera Eugene Onegin. It was bright and festive. But the vapor trails that lingered were the ones etched by that astonishing launch of the Symphony No. 5.
Steven Winn is a San Francisco freelance writer and critic and frequent City Arts & Lectures interviewer. His work has appeared in Art News, California, Humanities, and The San Francisco Chronicle, where he was the arts and culture critic from 2002 to 2008. His memoir, Come Back, Como: Winning the Heart of a Reluctant Dog, is published by Harper.
Recent CD Reviews
-
-
Handel: Atalanta
-
Gershwin: Orion Weiss
-
Rolando Villazón: Massenet Werther
-
Houston Grand Opera: Dead Man Walking



Comments
Just pointing out the typo.
It must be a sign of the bad economic times since there were so many empty seats at all 3 Marinsky concerts last weekend. Otherwise, I would say shame on the local Bay Area audiences who should have embraced this rare opportunity to hear 3 rarely performed Tchaikovsky symphonies live. Only a bi-polar and genius composer like Tchaikovsky can shift from ecstatic joy to utter abyssmal despair in the same symphonic movement and only the likes of Gergiev and this magnificent Marinsky Orchestra can really do justice to this music. This past weekend at Zellerbach Hall proved to be "an embarassement of riches" indeed.
What an orchestra! We who were there Saturday evening to hear the 5th Symphony had the rare experience of hearing something familiar played un-familiarly; a well-known, popular piece taken by the neck and shaken into so many different shapes it was almost a new piece. Doesn't happen often. But when it does, and when the themes are sublime, it re-shapes the soul as well. How lucky we were! Thanks to Steven Winn for a review that brought it all back.
I'm disinclined to attend purely musical performances in Zellerbach.
I hardly classify myself as an audiophile princess-and-the-pea case, but I've been irritated enough times by the acoustics of the hall -- especially when Cal Perfs packs 'em in for blockbuster "chamber" or piano recitals -- that I have a prejudice to skip events there. Irrational perhaps, and often to my cost in missed opportunities, but that's how it is.
In contrast, I find Hertz Hall just up the hill to be quite splendid.
My loss, there's no doubt, especially in this case. Thanks for the review!