May 1, 2010
Eschenbach Burns Through Zemlinsky and Schumann Symphonies
Guest conductor Christoph Eschenbach lit flames in two symphonies with the San Francisco Symphony at Davies Hall on Saturday evening. Whether he was conducting a familiar warhorse (Robert Schumann’s Symphony No. 4) or a rarity (Alexander Zemlinsky’s 1923 Lyric Symphony, a first performance by the Symphony — a fact omitted from the usual location in the program notes), Eschenbach made them sear. Joining him in the latter were the voices of bass-baritone James Johnson and soprano Christine Shäfer, so impressive that it hardly mattered that Zemlinsky’s apocalyptic orchestrations on occasion did some injustice to the sentiment in Rabindranath Tagore’s poetry.
The program began with a vigorous rendition of the Schumann, superbly controlled, yet with flexible rubato at all the right moments. Eschenbach exploited the fullest range of dynamics, heightening the music’s inherent drama. Exuding confidence and passion on the podium, the conductor was as interesting to watch as the music was to hear. Violin, cello, and oboe soloists did a fine job, though there were a couple of minor lapses in synchronicity of attack when their lines were doubled.
A Burden of Words
People can imagine what they like when listening to a “normal” symphony like Schumann’s, but when words and programs are attached, listeners must decide what to make of the composer’s literary intentions and their relationship to the music. Furthermore, some kind of structural rigor and logical progression should persist and not bend excessively to the external “story,” if a composer wants to adhere to the conventions that the term symphony implies.
From a formal standpoint, the work by Zemlinsky (1871-1942) is certainly a symphony. It is well organized. Surrounded by short orchestral interludes are seven Tagore poems about a male lured by adventure, a maiden infatuated with a prince, lovers’ tender exchanges, and regretful but somehow necessary separation. The symmetry of movement from isolation to intimacy and back to isolation again reminded me of a similar progression through the seven doors of Béla Bartók’s Bluebeard’s Castle. Tieing together the ordered segments, Zemlinsky utilized “cyclic” concepts of composition via the reappearance of germinal motives. The first such is a ponderous orchestral blast in dotted rhythm at the outset, worthy of a god of destruction. Yet when the orchestral introduction dies down, and Johnson sang the opening words to the same tune, they were “Ich bin friedlos,” translated “I am restless” — literally, “I am peaceless.” And herein lies the rub of the music.
The symphony was part of a trend in some quarters attempting to outdo even Wagner in grandiosity. There was an “instruments race” in parallel with the pre–World War I arms race, culminating in pieces like Gustav Mahler’s “Symphony of a Thousand” and finally in Eric Korngold’s gargantuan 1927 opera Das Wunder der Heliane. Note that the words are not exactly “I’m a warmonger,” and that they are followed by “I thirst for far-away things.” But Zemlinsky’s sound was an unmoderated Godzilla devouring New York.
Most of the time when the music climaxes, it is too overwrought for the subtlety of the poet. Had the symphony been composed for wordless vocalists, one could imagine monsters and be satisfied. But with words revealed, the listener, for example, has to fit “I flung the jewel from my breast” with music better suited to the elimination of Bikini Atoll.
Tender Moments
That said, the work contains many tender parts, beautifully imagined. A favorite section of mine was Zemlinsky’s treatment of “die sterne sind in Woken verloren” (The stars are lost in clouds), a diaphanous tincture of sound ravishingly delivered by Shäfer. Johnson, too, was in fine voice, though his stern visage and penetrating tones, like Zemlinsky’s music elsewhere, seemed a bit unsuited to the sensuousness of phrases like “You are the evening cloud floating in the sky of my dreams.” But then, if a more tender male singer were available for these portions, he would have been no match for the dense climaxes where Johnson shone through like a lighthouse in a tempest.
The beginning of the concert was delayed for about 15 minutes to accommodate latecomers having trouble getting over the Golden Gate Bridge. I wish the San Francisco Opera had delayed Salome last October for 24 hours when broken tie rods closed the Bay Bridge and prevented my passage. When the time comes to blow up the remains of that old span, Zemlinsky might be a good accompaniment.
Recent CD Reviews
-
Joyce Yang: Collage
-
Pacifica Quartet: The Soviet Experience
-
-
New Babylon
-
András Schiff: Geistervariationen



Comments
I was at the same delayed concert that Jeff Dunn attended, but he didn't mention the phenomenal (to me at least) ending of the Zemlinsky. As the orchestra settles into a quiet, shifting cloud of dissonance - the singer finishes with the words: "Stand still, O Beautiful End, for a moment, and say your last words in silence. I bow to you and hold up my lamp to light you on your way" - and sits down. The orchestra sustains chords, still subtlely shifting some notes, the basses, all eight of them, slide down to a grounding and satisfying deep note (with the simultaneous visual delight of eight hands rising in unison up the neck of their instruments). With this double bass addition one is led believe that this is the last sustained note, but no: a solo muted trumpet adds one more soft dissonance and the final chord, a dimished 13th or something like that, fades. What happened next was the phenomenal part: the conductor, Eschenbach, kept his hands held up, signaling the audience that it was not yet quite time for applause, then VERY slowly lowered his hands and amazingly, not a sound came from the audience - no cough, no throat clearing, no applause - until his hands dropped and even then, there was a second of silence before the clapping began. A very rare moment. Although there were early defectors during the louder parts, the whole audience "got it" at the very end.
Lets have more Zemlinsky!
I had the good fortune to be in the audience for this concert (thanks to donated tickets from the Community Music Center) and was astounded by the depth of his emotion balanced by the precise execution. Watching Eschenbach conduct reminded me of Zubin Mehta - the entire body is engaged, fearless and completely involved. The best part of the evening was at the close of Zemlinsky's Lyric. When the last note played, Eschenbach lifted his arms (spread as if an eagle) and held the moment for, what seemed an eternity. The note faded into the air, and then there was silence. But he didn't lower his arms- instead he held them as if to pull the air out of the room; to demand that we honor the music by not rushing out the door. No one coughed, moved or even shifted. We just sat, enraptured, listening to the fading sound and the growing silence. When at last he decided that the transformation was complete, he lowered his arms and the orchestra and audience breathed a collective sigh of relief. It was an extraordinary finish to a wonderful night at the Symphony. I recommend a listen of Eschenbach's concert with the LA Philharmonic posted on npr.org - his interpretation of Dvorak is unusually dynamic.
I echo the two comments above about the magical ending of the Zemlinsky. Even better was a brilliant performance of Mahler's 6th Symphony with the LA Philharmonic given two years ago in Gehry's acoustical masterpiece, Disney Hall. Emotionally riveting and played to perfection. I wonder what the real reason was for Eschenbach's departure from Philadelphia?
Robert Moon