October 2, 2009

Bach, Stewed

San Francisco Conservatory of Music
By Scott Cmiel

The Japanese guitarist Kazuhito Yamashita performed an ambitious, all-Bach program Friday at the San Francisco Conservatory of Music. The recital, presented by the Omni Foundation for the Performing Arts, featured arrangements of the First and Sixth Cello Suites as well as the Second Sonata for Solo Violin and had a decidedly mixed reception.

Yamashita first came to the attention of the guitar world over 20 years ago with his spectacular arrangement of Pictures at an Exhibition, by Modest Mussorgsky. A showpiece for virtuoso pianists, and familiar in various arrangements for orchestra, it did not seem to be a likely source for an arrangement for solo guitar, but Yamashita succeeded in performing the piece brilliantly and made a lasting impression, through his use of a broad color palette, an extraordinary dynamic range, and an amazing instrumental technique. The same assets were evident, and thrilled many, during Yamashita’s performances of Bach on Friday evening, yet in ways that I often found ill-suited to the music.

Each of Bach’s six cello suites takes the form of a group of Baroque dances, which the composer transforms into personal and profound spiritual statements. In these works, Bach creates the illusion of a full harmonic and contrapuntal texture by means of single melodic lines that outline or suggest an interplay of independent voices. It is a technique originally developed by lute composers and perfectly suited to the guitar, yet Yamashita’s performance was a major disappointment.

The First and Sixth Cello Suites both begin with simple, ornamented arpeggios and gradually acquire celebratory overtones. Both preludes feature a joyous exploration of resonating harmony and flower into exultant cascades. Yamashita randomly accented various notes of the opening figures and created a bewildering effect. The 16th-note passage at the end of the Sixth Suite Prelude, while technically impressive, was forced and created the impression of a mere virtuoso showpiece. The following movements each failed to convey the dance rhythm that is their essence. The Allemande and Sarabande of the Sixth Suite were given such a flexible pulse that they simply meandered. The Courante, Gavottes, and Gigue in both suites were characterized by a relentless drive and muscularity.

Bach’s Second Sonata for Solo Violin also creates the illusion of a full texture with single melodic lines, though it makes more use of chords and counterpoint than the Cello Suites. Yamashita used his control of dynamics to make clear the improvisatory melody and the guiding bass line of the opening Grave but again broke the continuity of the lines with seemingly random accentuation. The Fugue, though stunningly fast, was an unintelligible stew in which the various voices were indistinguishable. The Andante called forth some of the best playing of the evening. The repeated bass notes were well-paced and the singing melody was beautifully shaped. The final Allegro was taken at a blistering pace but many of the 32nd notes were unclear. The relentless drive left little room for nuance but delighted a portion of the audience.

Scott Cmiel is Chair of the guitar and musicianship departments at the San Francisco Conservatory of Music Preparatory Division and Director of the guitar program at San Francisco School of the Arts.

Comments

October 17, 2009
Predictable Review

Yamashita is the foremost classical guitarist in the world -- indeed, the only one of any importance to non-guitarists -- so the author's jealousy is not surprising.

Nor are his comments. For instance, Mr. Cmiel notes the "extraordinary dynamic range" of Yamashita's Bach, because he has heard the famously-wide dynamic range of Yamashita's "Pictures". In reality, Yamashita's Bach is quite restrained and intellectual. It's finest quality is not expressivity, but clarity.

Then, as is typical with critical reviews of Yamashita, the author takes a jab at the part of the audience (the majority) which responded enthusiastically. After all, Yamashita fans only like him because of his machine-gun accuracy, fastidious tuning, wide dynamic range, and incomparable mastery of tone; we're just too shallow to see past all those superficial qualities.

October 20, 2009
Seriously??

I have to ask John Hopfensperger a question. I don't really care if he, or anyone answers. I would guess (though I'm not stupid enough to promise) that this would be my final post on the subject.

Did you attend this particular concert? I freely admit that it is possible you are referring to a recording (which, if there is one, I am yet to hear) but this concert was as far from restrained as possible. His performance was both extreme and extremely tasteless. I recognize Yamashita's significance in guitar history, and even respect him as a guitarist, but the qualities that made him amazing when he was younger were not present in this particular concert.
Mr. Hopfensperger credits him with "machine-gun accuracy, fastidious tuning, wide dynamic range, and incomparable mastery of tone" but of those four descriptions, only the dynamic range was present on that friday night, and that in questionable taste. Machine-gun accuracy was blurred at breakneck speeds to the point where it was unclear if he was even bothering to play all the notes, let alone accurately (also, just a side note, but machine guns are incredibly inaccurate). The fastidious tuning left his g-string out sync with the rest of the guitar, no matter how many times he reached over and tapped the peg (or others) whilst in the midst of playing, frequently upsetting the line. Even his mastery of tone left much to be desired, and Mr. Cmiel states the reason. Random notes were popping out of what should have been smooth textures.

Now, I'm as shallow as the next person, perhaps more shallow (I do love my awful tv shows), but if I gave an opening concert to my guitar career that was exactly like that, I expect that no one would even give me a second look. At least, I wouldn't give me a second look.