When a young string player reaches the level of fame that can support a recital tour, he or she generally has to cast about for a suitable duo partner. Rare is the cellist or violinist who attains star appeal with a recital partnership ready-formed, given that the becoming-a-star part of the process tends to involve a lot of concerto playing and woodshedding and not much else.
In that sense, the young Armenian violinist Sergey Khachatryan, who presented a program of Bach, Brahms, and Shostakovich to a capacity audience at Berkeley's Hertz Hall Sunday afternoon, has the same leg up that Yehudi Menuhin and Gil Shaham had before him: a long-time duo partner in the shape of an exceptionally gifted sister-pianist. Lusine Khachatryan, on Sunday's showing, is on a par with her brother.
The Khachatryan siblings have visited the Bay Area before (and Sergey has also played the Mendelssohn and the Khachaturian violin concertos here within the last few years), but this was their Cal Performances debut. If the presenter's usual instinct for sticking to a good thing doesn't desert it, they'll be back.
Sergey Khachatryan's announced program included Bach's C-Major Solo Sonata, BWV 1005, by common assent the most demanding piece among the six sonatas and partitas. In the event, to my initial disappointment, he played the better-known D-Minor Partita (BWV 1004) instead. I say "initial" because it was hard to remain disappointed far into his account of the piece.
Khachatryan's was "traditionalist" Bach in the sense that he didn't feel compelled to pretend that he was playing a Baroque instrument. He avoided fussy nonvibrato, rolled chords, helter-skelter tempos, and ornamentation. He took first repeats only (when was the last time you heard a violinist do that in Bach?), and, in the Ciaccona, he used a realization of the arpeggios that I've scarcely heard since the old Heifetz recording I grew up with. (Leopold Auer's edition, maybe?)
All the same, this wasn't defiantly "oldstyle" playing either. It was neither polemically small nor defensively large, merely pitched at the violinist's equivalent of an ordinary speaking voice, and modulated with a corresponding naturalness. Technically it was near-flawless playing — squeaky clean in the passagework and the chords, and perfectly tuned. Still, it was the human sense of scale that impressed me most. (It can't have hurt that he was playing in Hertz Hall rather than the grander Zellerbach. If he keeps playing like this, though, he won't have that luxury on his next Cal Performances visit. As it was, the hall was packed.)
Khachatryan used his repeat scheme imaginatively. The first time through the first half of each dance was fairly bold, the second sotto voce, as though remembered and elaborated. Then the second half (which he played only once) would partake of both characters, as though the two versions of the first half had between them opened out the interpretive space.
As for the Ciaccona, Khachatryan's was as carefully shaped as any I've heard, but again with that feeling of natural delivery. The big arcs (like the huge arpeggiated passage that ends at the maggiore) swung and sang without any sense of artifice.
Michelle Dulak Thomson is a violinist and violist who has written about music for Strings, Stagebill, Early Music America, and The New York Times.